POWERFUL CLOUD BASED HAZOP ACTION TRACKING
The Pisys 360 Action Tracker is heavily used for HAZID, ENVID, SIL, LOPA - in fact any process which generates critical actions ! It's used by Operators and contractors world-wide who appreciate its simplicity and ease of access.
If you're a busy Chairman or scribe you've got enough on your plate without worrying about how HAZOP or HAZID ( or any other review type) actions are being recorded and managed
EXCEL is really great for recording actions - but pretty unhelpful when you find you've got multiple actions with different deadlines and multiple review stages
The Pisys HAZOP tracker (ATMS) provides a CENTRALISED and STRUCTURED way of recording and managing actions
You'd expect a HAZOP tracker to include Elements, Nodes, Risks, Causes, Consequences, Deviations, Safeguards etc - but what if you need to record a specific external document reference or e.g. an attachment showing a P&ID. With the Pisys HAZOP tracker you can quickly add fields to capture just about any type of data you need
See how Wood PLC use ATMS globally for HAZOP tracking
Blog
Common challenges in HAZOP action tracking
Introduction:
Identifying possible risks and operability problems in a variety of sectors can be done using the well-established HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) technique. To create a safe and effective working environment, potential dangers must first be identified. Organisations must monitor the activities and suggestions that come from the HAZOP study after it is finished to make sure that they are carried out and that the identified hazards are successfully controlled. Unfortunately, keeping track of HAZOP actions may be difficult, and organisations frequently encounter a number of challenges that can make it tricky to set up and keep up an efficient action monitoring system. In this article, we’ll talk about some of the typical problems with monitoring HAZOP actions that organisations run into and offer solutions.
Challenges in HAZOP Action Tracking:
Lack of Ownership:
Lack of ownership is one of the biggest problems with HAZOP action monitoring. A lot of the time, responsibility and ownership for the behaviours noted in the HAZOP research are unclear. As a result, delegating tasks to certain people or teams and keeping track of progress might be difficult.
It is crucial to create unambiguous ownership for each action in order to overcome this difficulty. This can be accomplished by designating a specific individual or team to complete each step and by establishing clear expectations and completion dates. To make sure that everyone involved is informed of the status of each action, it may also be beneficial to set up a system for tracking progress and giving frequent updates.
Inadequate Resources:
Lack of resources is a typical problem in HAZOP activity tracking. Organisations might not have the necessary staff, resources, or time to successfully monitor and carry out all of the suggested tasks. A backlog of tasks may be created as a result, which can be daunting and challenging to manage.
Prioritising actions according to their amount of risk and potential impact is crucial to overcoming this obstacle. This will assist organisations in directing their resources towards the most important tasks first. Establishing a system for classifying actions according to their importance and allocating resources in accordance with that classification may also be useful.
Poor Communication:
In HAZOP action tracking, good communication is essential, but poor communication can be very difficult. Making ensuring that everyone participating in the HAZOP research is aware of the suggested steps and giving updates and progress reports might be tough.
Establishing open lines of communication and making sure that everyone involved in the HAZOP research is aware of the suggested activities and their associated timeframes are crucial for overcoming this obstacle. A mechanism for monitoring progress and informing all stakeholders on a regular basis may also be beneficial.
Lack of Integration:
Many of the recommendations and actions that are frequently identified by HAZOP studies may need to be implemented across various teams or departments within an organisation. Unfortunately, it may be difficult to implement recommendations in a consistent and effective manner because different departments may have their own processes and procedures.
It is crucial to make sure that HAZOP guidelines and actions are incorporated into current processes and procedures in order to solve this difficulty. To do this, it is necessary to create effective channels of communication across teams and departments and to make sure that everyone taking part in the implementation process is aware of the suggested course of action.
Limited Accountability:
Lack of accountability is another frequent issue in HAZOP action monitoring. It can be difficult to guarantee that actions are completed on time and that the highlighted hazards are adequately controlled in the absence of clear accountability.
The key to overcoming this obstacle is to clearly define who is responsible for each action. This can be done by allocating tasks to particular people or teams, as well as by outlining the expectations and completion dates for each task. To make sure that everyone engaged is informed, it may also be beneficial to set up a system for monitoring progress and sending frequent updates.
The Pisys HAZOP action tracker has helped organisations world-wide to effectively manage critical HAZOP actions in an extremely simple and secure way. Please get in touch for more details or to organise a demo.